@j_bettany - 4 Feb 2010
Climate change emails between scientists reveal flaws in peer review – http://bit.ly/9QV56Q
Niche Clever Social Browser
Climate change emails between scientists reveal flaws in peer review – http://bit.ly/9QV56Q
There is little, if anything, in peer-reviewed journals about the paradox of good parents with bad children – http://nyti.ms/9xzHrH
Peer review highly sensitive to poor refereeing, claim researchers – http://bit.ly/dp55Fu
A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews – http://bit.ly/h2sMw6
Will Open Data Solve Peer Review Concerns? – http://bit.ly/q8Df7W
Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average http://t.co/nOx0hDmF via @comdig
#OpenAccess venture, PeerJ asks for a one-off fee to secure free lifetime publishing of peer-reviewed research #tcm http://t.co/mTTlHVXm
Twitter, peer review and altmetrics: the future of research impact assessment http://t.co/rcTPS8bu
Thanks @annareitman: Math Paper Hoax recalls Sokal, and make some uncomfortable points about Peer Review.
RT @undarkmag: Because preprints aren’t peer reviewed, it can be difficult for non-experts - including journalists, policymakers, and scien…
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature
Go deeper
Start something
